red tape in construction

 architecture, Australia, General  Comments Off on red tape in construction
Jul 102013
 

Re-work in construction is a costly business – an example being when a builder fails to measure twice before building a wall and then having to subsequently demolish and build it again. The cost naturally is borne by the builder if it is their fault and the total mounts into the $billions each year. A total waste of materials, as well as mind and body resources. However when requirements and therefore the time and cost is foisted upon others is when the line has been crossed and this is the point at which I consider red-tape is far is more onerous. While re-work is caused by the perpetrator and has a direct line of responsibility, the other is thrust upon others. And worse, the cost of this red tape is eventually borne by the client.

Today I lodged a letter at the request of an unnamed Council to support a Section 96 submission in Sydney’s north for a new house. Now council’s can and do request this additional information all the time – it is standard and allowable under the Act. What seems as quite incredulous in this day and age are the submission requirements in order to satisfy their request.

The Council  request for this information (of which my submission happened to be all of 3 pages!) is for 5 hard copies as well as a CD of the document in PDF format. CD’s? Of course it is no problem to me and takes little time, but can we move into the 21st century please? CD’s? Why not email, dropbox, a flash drive. It may as well be a 3.5″ or even a 5.25″ floppy disc. Tape drive or morse-code anyone? And if I didn’t lodge the CD, then they will outsource the scanning of one of the hard copies (of which you must supply 1 more hard copy for this sole purpose) and charge you for it.

floppy disks

…was floppy disks, now CD’s… but do we really need to hand over outdated media?

Naturally every Council has their own requirements, and they range from USB drives to electronic lodgement, while some do not require electronic copies at all.

The example I gave above is just a tiny example at the small end of the scale. When submitting a DA for a new house, the number of forms and checklists that must be submitted is forever increasing. By taking this same house, the actual DA required the following documentation:

  1. DA Form.
  2. Checklists.
  3. Letter of authority from the owner.
  4. Political Donations form.
  5. Drawings – Architecture (8 x A1’s) – 5 copies.
  6. Drawings – Survey – 5 copies.
  7. Drawings – Landscape Architecture – 5 copies.
  8. Drawings – Stormwater – 5 copies.
  9. Drawings – Shadows at 0900, 1200 and 1500 hrs at the equinox.
  10. Statement of Environmental Effects (50 pages) – 5 copies.
  11. Geotechnical Report (40 pages) – 5 copies.
  12. Bushfire Assessment Report.
  13. Arborist report – 5 copies.
  14. External Finishes Schedule – 5 copies.
  15. BCA Statement – 2 copies.
  16. Traffic and Parking Report – 2 copies.
  17. BASIX Certificate – 5 copies.
  18. Montage of the proposal – 2 copies.
  19. Model of the proposal.
  20. Notification drawings at A4 – 10 copies, and and don’t forget…
  21. a CD of the above.

The amount of paper required and printing generated requires trees felled en masse when all Council’s sprout their environmentally sustainable credentials. And this is not to mention the time required to print and sort and staple. And then there is the cost, all borne by the client or developer.

So what can be done about all of this red-tape? I am sure all of these reports and details are mostly read and digested, but sometimes they are not.  DA approvals are always laden with many conditions (sometimes 200 or so) many of which are already dealt with by the drawings and are often automatically generated by a computer upon the request of the assessing officer/s. The new Planning White Paper will relieve much of this with all Council’s having to have the same set of standard conditions, but that has its problems as well. In the meantime, we have to print and copy as requested by the authorities.

Let me know what you think – do we have too much red tape?

 

the latest in solar energy news

 Australia, Facts, International, Technology  Comments Off on the latest in solar energy news
Jun 212013
 

Solar panels have gone through somewhat of a craze over the last 5 years. From just 20,000 rooftops in 2008 to more than 1,000,000 rooftops in April 2013, that is an increase of 4,900%. But even with this massive growth, it still only accounts for 1.2% of Australia’s electricity needs. This increase will naturally slow down since NSW has scrapped its overly generous Feed-In-Tarrif scheme.

Still, there are approximately 10% of all houses fitted with the panels according to the Clean Energy Council. This equates to enough electricity being generated by renewable sources during this period to power the equivalent of more than 4 million Australian homes.

Solar Map of Australia

Solar Map of Australia

The price of panels has also been going down, though we could wish they went down as fast as the increase in number of installations. This was due to the price drop from the Chinese manufacturers who flooded the market.

In New South Wales, the Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal (IPART) was investigating the controversial solar feed-in tariffs, and are now reviewing submissions in the determination of a fair and reasonable value for electricity generated by small scale PV systems for 2013-2014. According to IPART the fair and reasonable value determined by IPART must not result in any increase in electricity prices in New South Wales, and must not be funded from the New South Wales Government budget.

Energy Matters has calculated that if all 400 sq.km of available roofing were to be used for solar panels the amount of energy produced would supply around 135% of Australia’s residential electricity needs. They said this would lead to a decrease in electricity prices – the cost being just 7 cents per KWh. Currently the cost is around 40 cents per KWh (depending on location and provider).

Australia has just one manufacturer of solar panels left – Tindo Solar, based in South Australia.  Although small by world standards – they employ just 16 people – they have capacity to manufacture 200,00 panels a year.

So let us know about your experience with solar panels – are they everything your though they would be?

May 102013
 

We have been an early adopter of 3d BIM technology, having used Revit since around 2002 so we can provide virtual designs to our clients and they can realistically see their building  before it is built. The next stage of technology is about to begin with augmented reality (AR).

AR refers to the process of laying computer-generated graphics onto real-world images in realtime. There are two types of AR:

With GPS and location-based technologies, technology originally developed for video and mobile games is combined with positioning software to create new areas of application for construction planning and design.

Vision-based AR uses a device’s camera as a lens through which you can experience an augmented world. To achieve this, a device must process each video frame coming off the camera sensor, compare it with data stored locally or in the cloud, find an object that matches the one in the frame, calculate the device’s relative position to that object, and then draw graphics that appear on top of it.

Hi-tech headsets, while some time away, will eventually come to construction sites and other industrial environments, providing capabilities which we could only dream about a few years ago.

Companies like Google and Vuzix are engaged in the development of head-worn portable computers, which we believe will be the next generation of hi-tech devices to follow the smart phone and tablet computers. It is expected both companies will be releasing their products sometime in 2013.

In architecture is where the greatest impacts will be made – by enabling designs to be uploaded to the glasses and then allowing someone wearing the glasses to view a BIM design or other images superimposed over the real world view of a site. As the wearer walks around the site the view in the glasses will adapt to its surroundings. Once a project is under construction as architects we will be able to visually check designs against what is built.

Google Glass

Google Glass

 

Other potential uses in the construction industry include property maintenance and services and design of HVAC (heating, ventilation, and air conditioning) systems. The technology will be able to “see-through” walls and floors for locating plumbing and ventilation systems. This allows teams to observe any changes by comparing the on-site location with information that has already been recorded.

Vuzix Wrap

Vuzix Wrap

 

Similarly a builder will be able to do the same providing faster and more efficient construction times. And the less time architects need to spend on site observing construction of projects, the greater time available to design better buildings. And that is in everyone’s interests.

May 102013
 

With the federal budget about to be brought down on May 14, the federal government could do far worse than foster an economic environment to make economic conditions more conducive to construction activities. Any austerity measures affecting construction activity will only serve to cut off the nose to spite the face.

A leading indicator of construction conditions throughout Australia has dropped to 7 month lows. Overall construction conditions deteriorated last month for the 35th consecutive month and more alarmingly, the pace of that contraction has sped up.

PCI-chart

 

According to the Performance of Construction Index report published by Australian Industry Group (Ai Group) and Housing Industry Association (HIA), in April, the Performance of Construction Index contracted by 3.6 points to 35.2.

In terms of individual sectors, engineering and housing led the decline, while commercial and apartments construction remained in negative territory frustrated by very tight credit conditions, large taxes and stiffingly high regulation. All of this coupled with weak demand resulting from a weak economy and historically high debt does little to stimulate further investment.

the new 2013 BCA and NCC

 architecture, Australia, General, Project Management  Comments Off on the new 2013 BCA and NCC
Apr 302013
 

The all new 2013 National Construction Code (NCC) comes into effect from tomorrow – 1 May 2013. Every newly designed building must now comply with this new version.

What is the NCC?

The NCC is an initiative of the Council of Australian Governments (COAG) developed to incorporate all on-site construction requirements into a single code. The NCC comprises 3 volumes: Volumes One and Two (the Building Code of Australia – the “BCA”), and Volume Three (the Plumbing Code of Australia – the “PCA”).

  • Volume One pertains primarily to Class 2 to 9 buildings
  • Volume Two pertains primarily to Class 1 and 10 buildings.
  • Volume Three pertains primarily to plumbing and drainage associated with all classes of buildings.

All three volumes are drafted in a performance format allowing a choice of Deemed-to-Satisfy Provisions or flexibility to develop Alternative Solutions based on existing or new innovative building, plumbing and drainage products, systems and designs.

The NCC retains the same dual approach to compliance incorporating some degree of flexibility, so that—

  • if compliance is achieved with the Deemed-to-Satisfy Provisions, then the proposal is deemed to have complied with the relevant volume of the NCC; or
  • if an alternative approach is desired, you have the opportunity to do so but the proposal must meet the Performance Requirements.

By using the performance-based system, the means by which the proposal will achieve compliance must be selected. This will be by either—

  • a deemed-to-satisfy solution;
  • an Alternative Solution; or
  • a mixture of deemed-to-satisfy and Alternative Solutions.

If an Alternative Solution is chosen, an Assessment Method must be chosen which satisfactorily indicates that the Alternative Solution will meet the relevant Performance Requirements. The nature of the Assessment Method will vary depending on the complexity of the Alternative Solution.

We have done many projects where alternative solutions are proposed and have been approved. A BCA compliance consultant will help in this regard.

Pan House, Chatswood

Pan House, Chatswood: one project where alternate solutions benefited the design

What is the biggest change to this BCA?

Without doubt the major change to this new BCA will be the new requirements for windows built above a certain height above the outside ground level and the associated barriers or screens required.

This is a noble attempt to prevent many falls resulting in injury and death. The ability of windows to be opened will be limited to prevent these falls from occurring. How this impacts on BCA ventilation requirements is still to be seen. It is to be noted that this is for bedrooms and childcare centres only at this stage. As always – ensure you gain the best advice possible in this regard to see if your situation requires it.

What other changes are there?

There a host of other changes including

  • accessible requirements into schools and other facilities;
  • braille indicators and door furniture requirements;
  • flood hazard area requirements;
  • footings and slabs construction

Make sure you comply

This is only a short post about the changes, and as such, please consult the NCC in detail. As always, every building must be designed to comply with the provisions of the BCA, and now the NCC. This doesn’t mean existing buildings must be made to comply – there are exceptions. To be sure, ask us and we can help out.

 

Connect with us:
Contact Us:

Email: ideas@proteusarchitects.com.au